Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Emily Jennings's avatar

I think one of my favorite theories that explains the high agency the women have in this book is that perhaps the author was simply a woman. It seems as the simplest explanation to me to be honest, because I just find it hard to believe "surrogate son" or not, the women would be such a forefront of a store with this much agency about them and be written by a man during the medieval period but, who knows, it's a mystery unfortunately.

Expand full comment
Christine's avatar

Hi, Kat! Nice post here! The quote you point out from the article struck me as well. In fact, there were quite a few points that stood out to me. One in particular being that men would often diminish each other's value by insulting each other—these insults would bring the men down by comparing them to women. Another point that Clover makes is how sodomy was not considered a homosexual act unless you were on the receiving end as that places you in a more feminine position. It is very interesting, and also a bit dismaying, to see how honor is placed among people in accordance to their gender roles, which you make note of in your post.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts